Why didn’t the Spacecraft used for the Apollo 11 mission melt in the Earth’s Atmosphere?









up vote
21
down vote

favorite
2












My brother has recently been converted to a Flat Earther and is convinced that something that proves his theory is the moon landings being faked by NASA. I have managed to counter argue the majority of his points, however yesterday he sent me a video which showed the various layers of the Earth’s atmosphere. The thermosphere in particular has temperatures that reach upto around 1500 Celsius. My research shows the majority of the Apollo 11 Spacecraft was made from an aluminium alloy, which has a melting point of 660.03 Celsius so I wondered how did it not melt whilst going through the atmosphere?



I am sorry if this is an obvious question/answer but I haven’t been able to find a good answer and I need something to stop him from going on about it! Thanks to anyone for any help.







share|improve this question

















  • 19




    The important thing to note is that 'melting point' is the temperature that the material itself needs to be in order to melt.
    – Jack
    yesterday






  • 19




    I am probably going to be very sorry for even asking this question, but … Why exactly does the Moon Landing being faked prove the Earth is Flat? Why would the Earth care whether Neil Armstrong stepped on the Moon or a studio in North Hollywood?
    – Jörg W Mittag
    yesterday






  • 4




    @JörgWMittag - It's not that the Moon landing being faked proves the Earth is flat, but rather that a flat Earth means that the Moon landings had to have been faked. Flat Earth is possibly the most dangerous religion there is.
    – David Hammen
    yesterday






  • 4




    You might also want to look at our canonical response to Moon landing deniers which also talks about flat earth a little: space.stackexchange.com/questions/28172/…
    – Organic Marble
    yesterday







  • 5




    @Carl - You're using logic. I'm not sure that's a productive tactic with the Flat-Earthers. :(
    – Don Branson
    yesterday














up vote
21
down vote

favorite
2












My brother has recently been converted to a Flat Earther and is convinced that something that proves his theory is the moon landings being faked by NASA. I have managed to counter argue the majority of his points, however yesterday he sent me a video which showed the various layers of the Earth’s atmosphere. The thermosphere in particular has temperatures that reach upto around 1500 Celsius. My research shows the majority of the Apollo 11 Spacecraft was made from an aluminium alloy, which has a melting point of 660.03 Celsius so I wondered how did it not melt whilst going through the atmosphere?



I am sorry if this is an obvious question/answer but I haven’t been able to find a good answer and I need something to stop him from going on about it! Thanks to anyone for any help.







share|improve this question

















  • 19




    The important thing to note is that 'melting point' is the temperature that the material itself needs to be in order to melt.
    – Jack
    yesterday






  • 19




    I am probably going to be very sorry for even asking this question, but … Why exactly does the Moon Landing being faked prove the Earth is Flat? Why would the Earth care whether Neil Armstrong stepped on the Moon or a studio in North Hollywood?
    – Jörg W Mittag
    yesterday






  • 4




    @JörgWMittag - It's not that the Moon landing being faked proves the Earth is flat, but rather that a flat Earth means that the Moon landings had to have been faked. Flat Earth is possibly the most dangerous religion there is.
    – David Hammen
    yesterday






  • 4




    You might also want to look at our canonical response to Moon landing deniers which also talks about flat earth a little: space.stackexchange.com/questions/28172/…
    – Organic Marble
    yesterday







  • 5




    @Carl - You're using logic. I'm not sure that's a productive tactic with the Flat-Earthers. :(
    – Don Branson
    yesterday












up vote
21
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
21
down vote

favorite
2






2





My brother has recently been converted to a Flat Earther and is convinced that something that proves his theory is the moon landings being faked by NASA. I have managed to counter argue the majority of his points, however yesterday he sent me a video which showed the various layers of the Earth’s atmosphere. The thermosphere in particular has temperatures that reach upto around 1500 Celsius. My research shows the majority of the Apollo 11 Spacecraft was made from an aluminium alloy, which has a melting point of 660.03 Celsius so I wondered how did it not melt whilst going through the atmosphere?



I am sorry if this is an obvious question/answer but I haven’t been able to find a good answer and I need something to stop him from going on about it! Thanks to anyone for any help.







share|improve this question













My brother has recently been converted to a Flat Earther and is convinced that something that proves his theory is the moon landings being faked by NASA. I have managed to counter argue the majority of his points, however yesterday he sent me a video which showed the various layers of the Earth’s atmosphere. The thermosphere in particular has temperatures that reach upto around 1500 Celsius. My research shows the majority of the Apollo 11 Spacecraft was made from an aluminium alloy, which has a melting point of 660.03 Celsius so I wondered how did it not melt whilst going through the atmosphere?



I am sorry if this is an obvious question/answer but I haven’t been able to find a good answer and I need something to stop him from going on about it! Thanks to anyone for any help.









share|improve this question












share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









Nathan Tuggy

3,16142135




3,16142135









asked yesterday









Allroundguy22

10613




10613







  • 19




    The important thing to note is that 'melting point' is the temperature that the material itself needs to be in order to melt.
    – Jack
    yesterday






  • 19




    I am probably going to be very sorry for even asking this question, but … Why exactly does the Moon Landing being faked prove the Earth is Flat? Why would the Earth care whether Neil Armstrong stepped on the Moon or a studio in North Hollywood?
    – Jörg W Mittag
    yesterday






  • 4




    @JörgWMittag - It's not that the Moon landing being faked proves the Earth is flat, but rather that a flat Earth means that the Moon landings had to have been faked. Flat Earth is possibly the most dangerous religion there is.
    – David Hammen
    yesterday






  • 4




    You might also want to look at our canonical response to Moon landing deniers which also talks about flat earth a little: space.stackexchange.com/questions/28172/…
    – Organic Marble
    yesterday







  • 5




    @Carl - You're using logic. I'm not sure that's a productive tactic with the Flat-Earthers. :(
    – Don Branson
    yesterday












  • 19




    The important thing to note is that 'melting point' is the temperature that the material itself needs to be in order to melt.
    – Jack
    yesterday






  • 19




    I am probably going to be very sorry for even asking this question, but … Why exactly does the Moon Landing being faked prove the Earth is Flat? Why would the Earth care whether Neil Armstrong stepped on the Moon or a studio in North Hollywood?
    – Jörg W Mittag
    yesterday






  • 4




    @JörgWMittag - It's not that the Moon landing being faked proves the Earth is flat, but rather that a flat Earth means that the Moon landings had to have been faked. Flat Earth is possibly the most dangerous religion there is.
    – David Hammen
    yesterday






  • 4




    You might also want to look at our canonical response to Moon landing deniers which also talks about flat earth a little: space.stackexchange.com/questions/28172/…
    – Organic Marble
    yesterday







  • 5




    @Carl - You're using logic. I'm not sure that's a productive tactic with the Flat-Earthers. :(
    – Don Branson
    yesterday







19




19




The important thing to note is that 'melting point' is the temperature that the material itself needs to be in order to melt.
– Jack
yesterday




The important thing to note is that 'melting point' is the temperature that the material itself needs to be in order to melt.
– Jack
yesterday




19




19




I am probably going to be very sorry for even asking this question, but … Why exactly does the Moon Landing being faked prove the Earth is Flat? Why would the Earth care whether Neil Armstrong stepped on the Moon or a studio in North Hollywood?
– Jörg W Mittag
yesterday




I am probably going to be very sorry for even asking this question, but … Why exactly does the Moon Landing being faked prove the Earth is Flat? Why would the Earth care whether Neil Armstrong stepped on the Moon or a studio in North Hollywood?
– Jörg W Mittag
yesterday




4




4




@JörgWMittag - It's not that the Moon landing being faked proves the Earth is flat, but rather that a flat Earth means that the Moon landings had to have been faked. Flat Earth is possibly the most dangerous religion there is.
– David Hammen
yesterday




@JörgWMittag - It's not that the Moon landing being faked proves the Earth is flat, but rather that a flat Earth means that the Moon landings had to have been faked. Flat Earth is possibly the most dangerous religion there is.
– David Hammen
yesterday




4




4




You might also want to look at our canonical response to Moon landing deniers which also talks about flat earth a little: space.stackexchange.com/questions/28172/…
– Organic Marble
yesterday





You might also want to look at our canonical response to Moon landing deniers which also talks about flat earth a little: space.stackexchange.com/questions/28172/…
– Organic Marble
yesterday





5




5




@Carl - You're using logic. I'm not sure that's a productive tactic with the Flat-Earthers. :(
– Don Branson
yesterday




@Carl - You're using logic. I'm not sure that's a productive tactic with the Flat-Earthers. :(
– Don Branson
yesterday










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
48
down vote













Although the temperature at altitude CAN be several thousands of degrees, the atmosphere is so thin it does not transfer heat efficiently. Wikipedia explains it very well -




The highly diluted gas in this layer can reach 2,500 °C (4,530 °F) during the day. Even though the temperature is so high, one would not feel warm in the thermosphere, because it is so near vacuum that there is not enough contact with the few atoms of gas to transfer much heat. A normal thermometer might indicate significantly below 0 °C (32 °F), at least at night, because the energy lost by thermal radiation would exceed the energy acquired from the atmospheric gas by direct contact




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermosphere



The high temperatures experienced travelling out of and back into the atmosphere are those of greatest concern, particularly the latter. On ascent they are high but comfortably within the parameters of modern materials because the craft are travelling relatively slowly in the thicker atmosphere and faster when the atmosphere thins/becomes vaccuum. On descent, i.e. re-entry, the shockwave caused by spacecraft colliding with atoms in the air causes the air to compress, which in turn creates heat. It is NOT due to friction. If you want to see the same effect on a smaller scale, take a deflated football and pump it up as fast as you can, the quickly feel the nozzle of your pump. It will be hot, because the compression of air causing heat has transferred to the nozzle.



Flat earth is an unfortunate belief at odds with mountains of evidence. Sorry to hear your brother has fallen for it.



I suspect that even providing evidence will not be sufficient to dissuade him, based on my own experience of flat-earthers.






share|improve this answer



















  • 7




    @gerrit: Actually, it is. Flat Earthers believe that Round Earth Theory is a conspiracy by the world-government, invented in order to keep us under control. Now, I have no idea why wrongly believing that the Earth is round would keep us under control, but that's what they believe. (At least, ChemTrailers have a sort-of twisted internally consistent logic, in that spraying mind-control drugs into the atmosphere could in some extremely convoluted way and ignoring the fact that the drugs would be too diluted to have any effect, be used for … you know … mind-control.)
    – Jörg W Mittag
    yesterday







  • 6




    @gerrit - To double down on what Jörg wrote, flat Earth is the biggest conspiracy theory of all. The cabal who promulgate round earthism has been in charge for over two thousand years. All of the science teachers on the planet, along with all scientists, everyone who claims to have traveled to Antarctica or around the world are either part of the cabal or have been completely ensnared by it. Some conspiracies turn out to be true. The life span of a true conspiracy is inversely proportional to the number of conspirators. This one is so huge it couldn't last a second.
    – David Hammen
    yesterday










  • Why does air compression cause heat?
    – opa
    yesterday






  • 2




    @opa - not specifically "air", but compression of any gas. Compressing the gas makes the molecules come closer together and bump into each other more frequently. Like an air conditioner, compress the gas (Freon) to basically a liquid and it heats up. Remove the heat with a coil and a fan (outdoors). Then send the now cooled/warm liquid back (indoors) to another coil/fan where the Freon is now expanded, which makes everything very cold. --->
    – Kevin Fegan
    yesterday







  • 1




    @opa - (continued) - Gay-Lussac's Law: The Pressure Temperature Law. This law states that the pressure of a given amount of gas held at constant volume is directly proportional to the Kelvin temperature. As the pressure goes up, the temperature also goes up, and vice-versa.
    – Kevin Fegan
    yesterday

















up vote
23
down vote













It's not the temperature that matters, it's the heat transfer.



The density of the atmosphere up in the thermosphere is very very thin. There simply isn't nearly enough mass to transfer any significant amount of heat from the thermosphere to a spacecraft travelling through it.



Spacecraft do need heat protection to survive re-entry, but that is because they're travelling so fast relative to the surrounding medium, not because of the temperature of the tenuous atmosphere that the medium consists of.






share|improve this answer

















  • 2




    A somewhat related recent question
    – Jack
    yesterday







  • 5




    To illustrate the importance of material density in transferring heat, touching water at 70C will produce third-degree burns almost immediately. But you can heat your oven to 250C and stick your hand in for a remarkably long time without injury.
    – Mark
    yesterday






  • 2




    You probably meant to say, don't try this at home! If you touch any part of the metal frame of the oven with your hand, you'll get burned instantly. It's only the air in a heated oven that is not immediately dangerous: the metal parts are EXTREMELY dangerous at that temperature.
    – Ed999
    yesterday

















up vote
1
down vote













As 'SF' mentioned; the capsule was insulated with an ablative cover. You can read about it in NASA's document: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19740007423.pdf






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Just a comment:
    If you remember, a shuttle (STS 107) was lost over Texas during reentry because some ablative tiles had been knocked off during lift-off. Reentry heat damaged the unprotected structure resulting in the shuttle being torn apart.
    As a Grumman employee, I was involved in building an EVA work platform that was designed before the first shuttle flight to be used before reentry. A crew member would use it to inspect and repair any tiles that had been lost during liftoff. We built and tested the platform in the weightless simulator at JSC, but before the first shuttle flight, NASA determined that the tiles would be secure and remain in place during liftoff and flight, so the platform was never flown.






    share|improve this answer





















    • If this is a comment, it should be posted as one, but not as an answer.
      – Uwe
      8 hours ago






    • 2




      this has very little to do with this question, as far as I can see.
      – JCRM
      5 hours ago










    • This is a great bit of space history! When you reach 50 reputation (points) you'll be able to post comments on other people's posts. Until then, note that Stack Exchange has a fairly rigid definition of question and answer posts. Since this is a comment, it shouldn't appear as an answer to the question. You can learn more in the help center and if you have a minute, you can take the tour. Welcome to Stack Exchange!
      – uhoh
      1 hour ago










    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "508"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30155%2fwhy-didn-t-the-spacecraft-used-for-the-apollo-11-mission-melt-in-the-earth-s-atm%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    48
    down vote













    Although the temperature at altitude CAN be several thousands of degrees, the atmosphere is so thin it does not transfer heat efficiently. Wikipedia explains it very well -




    The highly diluted gas in this layer can reach 2,500 °C (4,530 °F) during the day. Even though the temperature is so high, one would not feel warm in the thermosphere, because it is so near vacuum that there is not enough contact with the few atoms of gas to transfer much heat. A normal thermometer might indicate significantly below 0 °C (32 °F), at least at night, because the energy lost by thermal radiation would exceed the energy acquired from the atmospheric gas by direct contact




    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermosphere



    The high temperatures experienced travelling out of and back into the atmosphere are those of greatest concern, particularly the latter. On ascent they are high but comfortably within the parameters of modern materials because the craft are travelling relatively slowly in the thicker atmosphere and faster when the atmosphere thins/becomes vaccuum. On descent, i.e. re-entry, the shockwave caused by spacecraft colliding with atoms in the air causes the air to compress, which in turn creates heat. It is NOT due to friction. If you want to see the same effect on a smaller scale, take a deflated football and pump it up as fast as you can, the quickly feel the nozzle of your pump. It will be hot, because the compression of air causing heat has transferred to the nozzle.



    Flat earth is an unfortunate belief at odds with mountains of evidence. Sorry to hear your brother has fallen for it.



    I suspect that even providing evidence will not be sufficient to dissuade him, based on my own experience of flat-earthers.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 7




      @gerrit: Actually, it is. Flat Earthers believe that Round Earth Theory is a conspiracy by the world-government, invented in order to keep us under control. Now, I have no idea why wrongly believing that the Earth is round would keep us under control, but that's what they believe. (At least, ChemTrailers have a sort-of twisted internally consistent logic, in that spraying mind-control drugs into the atmosphere could in some extremely convoluted way and ignoring the fact that the drugs would be too diluted to have any effect, be used for … you know … mind-control.)
      – Jörg W Mittag
      yesterday







    • 6




      @gerrit - To double down on what Jörg wrote, flat Earth is the biggest conspiracy theory of all. The cabal who promulgate round earthism has been in charge for over two thousand years. All of the science teachers on the planet, along with all scientists, everyone who claims to have traveled to Antarctica or around the world are either part of the cabal or have been completely ensnared by it. Some conspiracies turn out to be true. The life span of a true conspiracy is inversely proportional to the number of conspirators. This one is so huge it couldn't last a second.
      – David Hammen
      yesterday










    • Why does air compression cause heat?
      – opa
      yesterday






    • 2




      @opa - not specifically "air", but compression of any gas. Compressing the gas makes the molecules come closer together and bump into each other more frequently. Like an air conditioner, compress the gas (Freon) to basically a liquid and it heats up. Remove the heat with a coil and a fan (outdoors). Then send the now cooled/warm liquid back (indoors) to another coil/fan where the Freon is now expanded, which makes everything very cold. --->
      – Kevin Fegan
      yesterday







    • 1




      @opa - (continued) - Gay-Lussac's Law: The Pressure Temperature Law. This law states that the pressure of a given amount of gas held at constant volume is directly proportional to the Kelvin temperature. As the pressure goes up, the temperature also goes up, and vice-versa.
      – Kevin Fegan
      yesterday














    up vote
    48
    down vote













    Although the temperature at altitude CAN be several thousands of degrees, the atmosphere is so thin it does not transfer heat efficiently. Wikipedia explains it very well -




    The highly diluted gas in this layer can reach 2,500 °C (4,530 °F) during the day. Even though the temperature is so high, one would not feel warm in the thermosphere, because it is so near vacuum that there is not enough contact with the few atoms of gas to transfer much heat. A normal thermometer might indicate significantly below 0 °C (32 °F), at least at night, because the energy lost by thermal radiation would exceed the energy acquired from the atmospheric gas by direct contact




    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermosphere



    The high temperatures experienced travelling out of and back into the atmosphere are those of greatest concern, particularly the latter. On ascent they are high but comfortably within the parameters of modern materials because the craft are travelling relatively slowly in the thicker atmosphere and faster when the atmosphere thins/becomes vaccuum. On descent, i.e. re-entry, the shockwave caused by spacecraft colliding with atoms in the air causes the air to compress, which in turn creates heat. It is NOT due to friction. If you want to see the same effect on a smaller scale, take a deflated football and pump it up as fast as you can, the quickly feel the nozzle of your pump. It will be hot, because the compression of air causing heat has transferred to the nozzle.



    Flat earth is an unfortunate belief at odds with mountains of evidence. Sorry to hear your brother has fallen for it.



    I suspect that even providing evidence will not be sufficient to dissuade him, based on my own experience of flat-earthers.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 7




      @gerrit: Actually, it is. Flat Earthers believe that Round Earth Theory is a conspiracy by the world-government, invented in order to keep us under control. Now, I have no idea why wrongly believing that the Earth is round would keep us under control, but that's what they believe. (At least, ChemTrailers have a sort-of twisted internally consistent logic, in that spraying mind-control drugs into the atmosphere could in some extremely convoluted way and ignoring the fact that the drugs would be too diluted to have any effect, be used for … you know … mind-control.)
      – Jörg W Mittag
      yesterday







    • 6




      @gerrit - To double down on what Jörg wrote, flat Earth is the biggest conspiracy theory of all. The cabal who promulgate round earthism has been in charge for over two thousand years. All of the science teachers on the planet, along with all scientists, everyone who claims to have traveled to Antarctica or around the world are either part of the cabal or have been completely ensnared by it. Some conspiracies turn out to be true. The life span of a true conspiracy is inversely proportional to the number of conspirators. This one is so huge it couldn't last a second.
      – David Hammen
      yesterday










    • Why does air compression cause heat?
      – opa
      yesterday






    • 2




      @opa - not specifically "air", but compression of any gas. Compressing the gas makes the molecules come closer together and bump into each other more frequently. Like an air conditioner, compress the gas (Freon) to basically a liquid and it heats up. Remove the heat with a coil and a fan (outdoors). Then send the now cooled/warm liquid back (indoors) to another coil/fan where the Freon is now expanded, which makes everything very cold. --->
      – Kevin Fegan
      yesterday







    • 1




      @opa - (continued) - Gay-Lussac's Law: The Pressure Temperature Law. This law states that the pressure of a given amount of gas held at constant volume is directly proportional to the Kelvin temperature. As the pressure goes up, the temperature also goes up, and vice-versa.
      – Kevin Fegan
      yesterday












    up vote
    48
    down vote










    up vote
    48
    down vote









    Although the temperature at altitude CAN be several thousands of degrees, the atmosphere is so thin it does not transfer heat efficiently. Wikipedia explains it very well -




    The highly diluted gas in this layer can reach 2,500 °C (4,530 °F) during the day. Even though the temperature is so high, one would not feel warm in the thermosphere, because it is so near vacuum that there is not enough contact with the few atoms of gas to transfer much heat. A normal thermometer might indicate significantly below 0 °C (32 °F), at least at night, because the energy lost by thermal radiation would exceed the energy acquired from the atmospheric gas by direct contact




    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermosphere



    The high temperatures experienced travelling out of and back into the atmosphere are those of greatest concern, particularly the latter. On ascent they are high but comfortably within the parameters of modern materials because the craft are travelling relatively slowly in the thicker atmosphere and faster when the atmosphere thins/becomes vaccuum. On descent, i.e. re-entry, the shockwave caused by spacecraft colliding with atoms in the air causes the air to compress, which in turn creates heat. It is NOT due to friction. If you want to see the same effect on a smaller scale, take a deflated football and pump it up as fast as you can, the quickly feel the nozzle of your pump. It will be hot, because the compression of air causing heat has transferred to the nozzle.



    Flat earth is an unfortunate belief at odds with mountains of evidence. Sorry to hear your brother has fallen for it.



    I suspect that even providing evidence will not be sufficient to dissuade him, based on my own experience of flat-earthers.






    share|improve this answer















    Although the temperature at altitude CAN be several thousands of degrees, the atmosphere is so thin it does not transfer heat efficiently. Wikipedia explains it very well -




    The highly diluted gas in this layer can reach 2,500 °C (4,530 °F) during the day. Even though the temperature is so high, one would not feel warm in the thermosphere, because it is so near vacuum that there is not enough contact with the few atoms of gas to transfer much heat. A normal thermometer might indicate significantly below 0 °C (32 °F), at least at night, because the energy lost by thermal radiation would exceed the energy acquired from the atmospheric gas by direct contact




    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermosphere



    The high temperatures experienced travelling out of and back into the atmosphere are those of greatest concern, particularly the latter. On ascent they are high but comfortably within the parameters of modern materials because the craft are travelling relatively slowly in the thicker atmosphere and faster when the atmosphere thins/becomes vaccuum. On descent, i.e. re-entry, the shockwave caused by spacecraft colliding with atoms in the air causes the air to compress, which in turn creates heat. It is NOT due to friction. If you want to see the same effect on a smaller scale, take a deflated football and pump it up as fast as you can, the quickly feel the nozzle of your pump. It will be hot, because the compression of air causing heat has transferred to the nozzle.



    Flat earth is an unfortunate belief at odds with mountains of evidence. Sorry to hear your brother has fallen for it.



    I suspect that even providing evidence will not be sufficient to dissuade him, based on my own experience of flat-earthers.







    share|improve this answer















    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited yesterday









    called2voyage♦

    14.7k665121




    14.7k665121











    answered yesterday









    david_c

    55917




    55917







    • 7




      @gerrit: Actually, it is. Flat Earthers believe that Round Earth Theory is a conspiracy by the world-government, invented in order to keep us under control. Now, I have no idea why wrongly believing that the Earth is round would keep us under control, but that's what they believe. (At least, ChemTrailers have a sort-of twisted internally consistent logic, in that spraying mind-control drugs into the atmosphere could in some extremely convoluted way and ignoring the fact that the drugs would be too diluted to have any effect, be used for … you know … mind-control.)
      – Jörg W Mittag
      yesterday







    • 6




      @gerrit - To double down on what Jörg wrote, flat Earth is the biggest conspiracy theory of all. The cabal who promulgate round earthism has been in charge for over two thousand years. All of the science teachers on the planet, along with all scientists, everyone who claims to have traveled to Antarctica or around the world are either part of the cabal or have been completely ensnared by it. Some conspiracies turn out to be true. The life span of a true conspiracy is inversely proportional to the number of conspirators. This one is so huge it couldn't last a second.
      – David Hammen
      yesterday










    • Why does air compression cause heat?
      – opa
      yesterday






    • 2




      @opa - not specifically "air", but compression of any gas. Compressing the gas makes the molecules come closer together and bump into each other more frequently. Like an air conditioner, compress the gas (Freon) to basically a liquid and it heats up. Remove the heat with a coil and a fan (outdoors). Then send the now cooled/warm liquid back (indoors) to another coil/fan where the Freon is now expanded, which makes everything very cold. --->
      – Kevin Fegan
      yesterday







    • 1




      @opa - (continued) - Gay-Lussac's Law: The Pressure Temperature Law. This law states that the pressure of a given amount of gas held at constant volume is directly proportional to the Kelvin temperature. As the pressure goes up, the temperature also goes up, and vice-versa.
      – Kevin Fegan
      yesterday












    • 7




      @gerrit: Actually, it is. Flat Earthers believe that Round Earth Theory is a conspiracy by the world-government, invented in order to keep us under control. Now, I have no idea why wrongly believing that the Earth is round would keep us under control, but that's what they believe. (At least, ChemTrailers have a sort-of twisted internally consistent logic, in that spraying mind-control drugs into the atmosphere could in some extremely convoluted way and ignoring the fact that the drugs would be too diluted to have any effect, be used for … you know … mind-control.)
      – Jörg W Mittag
      yesterday







    • 6




      @gerrit - To double down on what Jörg wrote, flat Earth is the biggest conspiracy theory of all. The cabal who promulgate round earthism has been in charge for over two thousand years. All of the science teachers on the planet, along with all scientists, everyone who claims to have traveled to Antarctica or around the world are either part of the cabal or have been completely ensnared by it. Some conspiracies turn out to be true. The life span of a true conspiracy is inversely proportional to the number of conspirators. This one is so huge it couldn't last a second.
      – David Hammen
      yesterday










    • Why does air compression cause heat?
      – opa
      yesterday






    • 2




      @opa - not specifically "air", but compression of any gas. Compressing the gas makes the molecules come closer together and bump into each other more frequently. Like an air conditioner, compress the gas (Freon) to basically a liquid and it heats up. Remove the heat with a coil and a fan (outdoors). Then send the now cooled/warm liquid back (indoors) to another coil/fan where the Freon is now expanded, which makes everything very cold. --->
      – Kevin Fegan
      yesterday







    • 1




      @opa - (continued) - Gay-Lussac's Law: The Pressure Temperature Law. This law states that the pressure of a given amount of gas held at constant volume is directly proportional to the Kelvin temperature. As the pressure goes up, the temperature also goes up, and vice-versa.
      – Kevin Fegan
      yesterday







    7




    7




    @gerrit: Actually, it is. Flat Earthers believe that Round Earth Theory is a conspiracy by the world-government, invented in order to keep us under control. Now, I have no idea why wrongly believing that the Earth is round would keep us under control, but that's what they believe. (At least, ChemTrailers have a sort-of twisted internally consistent logic, in that spraying mind-control drugs into the atmosphere could in some extremely convoluted way and ignoring the fact that the drugs would be too diluted to have any effect, be used for … you know … mind-control.)
    – Jörg W Mittag
    yesterday





    @gerrit: Actually, it is. Flat Earthers believe that Round Earth Theory is a conspiracy by the world-government, invented in order to keep us under control. Now, I have no idea why wrongly believing that the Earth is round would keep us under control, but that's what they believe. (At least, ChemTrailers have a sort-of twisted internally consistent logic, in that spraying mind-control drugs into the atmosphere could in some extremely convoluted way and ignoring the fact that the drugs would be too diluted to have any effect, be used for … you know … mind-control.)
    – Jörg W Mittag
    yesterday





    6




    6




    @gerrit - To double down on what Jörg wrote, flat Earth is the biggest conspiracy theory of all. The cabal who promulgate round earthism has been in charge for over two thousand years. All of the science teachers on the planet, along with all scientists, everyone who claims to have traveled to Antarctica or around the world are either part of the cabal or have been completely ensnared by it. Some conspiracies turn out to be true. The life span of a true conspiracy is inversely proportional to the number of conspirators. This one is so huge it couldn't last a second.
    – David Hammen
    yesterday




    @gerrit - To double down on what Jörg wrote, flat Earth is the biggest conspiracy theory of all. The cabal who promulgate round earthism has been in charge for over two thousand years. All of the science teachers on the planet, along with all scientists, everyone who claims to have traveled to Antarctica or around the world are either part of the cabal or have been completely ensnared by it. Some conspiracies turn out to be true. The life span of a true conspiracy is inversely proportional to the number of conspirators. This one is so huge it couldn't last a second.
    – David Hammen
    yesterday












    Why does air compression cause heat?
    – opa
    yesterday




    Why does air compression cause heat?
    – opa
    yesterday




    2




    2




    @opa - not specifically "air", but compression of any gas. Compressing the gas makes the molecules come closer together and bump into each other more frequently. Like an air conditioner, compress the gas (Freon) to basically a liquid and it heats up. Remove the heat with a coil and a fan (outdoors). Then send the now cooled/warm liquid back (indoors) to another coil/fan where the Freon is now expanded, which makes everything very cold. --->
    – Kevin Fegan
    yesterday





    @opa - not specifically "air", but compression of any gas. Compressing the gas makes the molecules come closer together and bump into each other more frequently. Like an air conditioner, compress the gas (Freon) to basically a liquid and it heats up. Remove the heat with a coil and a fan (outdoors). Then send the now cooled/warm liquid back (indoors) to another coil/fan where the Freon is now expanded, which makes everything very cold. --->
    – Kevin Fegan
    yesterday





    1




    1




    @opa - (continued) - Gay-Lussac's Law: The Pressure Temperature Law. This law states that the pressure of a given amount of gas held at constant volume is directly proportional to the Kelvin temperature. As the pressure goes up, the temperature also goes up, and vice-versa.
    – Kevin Fegan
    yesterday




    @opa - (continued) - Gay-Lussac's Law: The Pressure Temperature Law. This law states that the pressure of a given amount of gas held at constant volume is directly proportional to the Kelvin temperature. As the pressure goes up, the temperature also goes up, and vice-versa.
    – Kevin Fegan
    yesterday










    up vote
    23
    down vote













    It's not the temperature that matters, it's the heat transfer.



    The density of the atmosphere up in the thermosphere is very very thin. There simply isn't nearly enough mass to transfer any significant amount of heat from the thermosphere to a spacecraft travelling through it.



    Spacecraft do need heat protection to survive re-entry, but that is because they're travelling so fast relative to the surrounding medium, not because of the temperature of the tenuous atmosphere that the medium consists of.






    share|improve this answer

















    • 2




      A somewhat related recent question
      – Jack
      yesterday







    • 5




      To illustrate the importance of material density in transferring heat, touching water at 70C will produce third-degree burns almost immediately. But you can heat your oven to 250C and stick your hand in for a remarkably long time without injury.
      – Mark
      yesterday






    • 2




      You probably meant to say, don't try this at home! If you touch any part of the metal frame of the oven with your hand, you'll get burned instantly. It's only the air in a heated oven that is not immediately dangerous: the metal parts are EXTREMELY dangerous at that temperature.
      – Ed999
      yesterday














    up vote
    23
    down vote













    It's not the temperature that matters, it's the heat transfer.



    The density of the atmosphere up in the thermosphere is very very thin. There simply isn't nearly enough mass to transfer any significant amount of heat from the thermosphere to a spacecraft travelling through it.



    Spacecraft do need heat protection to survive re-entry, but that is because they're travelling so fast relative to the surrounding medium, not because of the temperature of the tenuous atmosphere that the medium consists of.






    share|improve this answer

















    • 2




      A somewhat related recent question
      – Jack
      yesterday







    • 5




      To illustrate the importance of material density in transferring heat, touching water at 70C will produce third-degree burns almost immediately. But you can heat your oven to 250C and stick your hand in for a remarkably long time without injury.
      – Mark
      yesterday






    • 2




      You probably meant to say, don't try this at home! If you touch any part of the metal frame of the oven with your hand, you'll get burned instantly. It's only the air in a heated oven that is not immediately dangerous: the metal parts are EXTREMELY dangerous at that temperature.
      – Ed999
      yesterday












    up vote
    23
    down vote










    up vote
    23
    down vote









    It's not the temperature that matters, it's the heat transfer.



    The density of the atmosphere up in the thermosphere is very very thin. There simply isn't nearly enough mass to transfer any significant amount of heat from the thermosphere to a spacecraft travelling through it.



    Spacecraft do need heat protection to survive re-entry, but that is because they're travelling so fast relative to the surrounding medium, not because of the temperature of the tenuous atmosphere that the medium consists of.






    share|improve this answer













    It's not the temperature that matters, it's the heat transfer.



    The density of the atmosphere up in the thermosphere is very very thin. There simply isn't nearly enough mass to transfer any significant amount of heat from the thermosphere to a spacecraft travelling through it.



    Spacecraft do need heat protection to survive re-entry, but that is because they're travelling so fast relative to the surrounding medium, not because of the temperature of the tenuous atmosphere that the medium consists of.







    share|improve this answer













    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer











    answered yesterday









    gerrit

    5,8332565




    5,8332565







    • 2




      A somewhat related recent question
      – Jack
      yesterday







    • 5




      To illustrate the importance of material density in transferring heat, touching water at 70C will produce third-degree burns almost immediately. But you can heat your oven to 250C and stick your hand in for a remarkably long time without injury.
      – Mark
      yesterday






    • 2




      You probably meant to say, don't try this at home! If you touch any part of the metal frame of the oven with your hand, you'll get burned instantly. It's only the air in a heated oven that is not immediately dangerous: the metal parts are EXTREMELY dangerous at that temperature.
      – Ed999
      yesterday












    • 2




      A somewhat related recent question
      – Jack
      yesterday







    • 5




      To illustrate the importance of material density in transferring heat, touching water at 70C will produce third-degree burns almost immediately. But you can heat your oven to 250C and stick your hand in for a remarkably long time without injury.
      – Mark
      yesterday






    • 2




      You probably meant to say, don't try this at home! If you touch any part of the metal frame of the oven with your hand, you'll get burned instantly. It's only the air in a heated oven that is not immediately dangerous: the metal parts are EXTREMELY dangerous at that temperature.
      – Ed999
      yesterday







    2




    2




    A somewhat related recent question
    – Jack
    yesterday





    A somewhat related recent question
    – Jack
    yesterday





    5




    5




    To illustrate the importance of material density in transferring heat, touching water at 70C will produce third-degree burns almost immediately. But you can heat your oven to 250C and stick your hand in for a remarkably long time without injury.
    – Mark
    yesterday




    To illustrate the importance of material density in transferring heat, touching water at 70C will produce third-degree burns almost immediately. But you can heat your oven to 250C and stick your hand in for a remarkably long time without injury.
    – Mark
    yesterday




    2




    2




    You probably meant to say, don't try this at home! If you touch any part of the metal frame of the oven with your hand, you'll get burned instantly. It's only the air in a heated oven that is not immediately dangerous: the metal parts are EXTREMELY dangerous at that temperature.
    – Ed999
    yesterday




    You probably meant to say, don't try this at home! If you touch any part of the metal frame of the oven with your hand, you'll get burned instantly. It's only the air in a heated oven that is not immediately dangerous: the metal parts are EXTREMELY dangerous at that temperature.
    – Ed999
    yesterday










    up vote
    1
    down vote













    As 'SF' mentioned; the capsule was insulated with an ablative cover. You can read about it in NASA's document: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19740007423.pdf






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      As 'SF' mentioned; the capsule was insulated with an ablative cover. You can read about it in NASA's document: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19740007423.pdf






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        As 'SF' mentioned; the capsule was insulated with an ablative cover. You can read about it in NASA's document: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19740007423.pdf






        share|improve this answer













        As 'SF' mentioned; the capsule was insulated with an ablative cover. You can read about it in NASA's document: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19740007423.pdf







        share|improve this answer













        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer











        answered yesterday









        CAM

        111




        111




















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Just a comment:
            If you remember, a shuttle (STS 107) was lost over Texas during reentry because some ablative tiles had been knocked off during lift-off. Reentry heat damaged the unprotected structure resulting in the shuttle being torn apart.
            As a Grumman employee, I was involved in building an EVA work platform that was designed before the first shuttle flight to be used before reentry. A crew member would use it to inspect and repair any tiles that had been lost during liftoff. We built and tested the platform in the weightless simulator at JSC, but before the first shuttle flight, NASA determined that the tiles would be secure and remain in place during liftoff and flight, so the platform was never flown.






            share|improve this answer





















            • If this is a comment, it should be posted as one, but not as an answer.
              – Uwe
              8 hours ago






            • 2




              this has very little to do with this question, as far as I can see.
              – JCRM
              5 hours ago










            • This is a great bit of space history! When you reach 50 reputation (points) you'll be able to post comments on other people's posts. Until then, note that Stack Exchange has a fairly rigid definition of question and answer posts. Since this is a comment, it shouldn't appear as an answer to the question. You can learn more in the help center and if you have a minute, you can take the tour. Welcome to Stack Exchange!
              – uhoh
              1 hour ago














            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Just a comment:
            If you remember, a shuttle (STS 107) was lost over Texas during reentry because some ablative tiles had been knocked off during lift-off. Reentry heat damaged the unprotected structure resulting in the shuttle being torn apart.
            As a Grumman employee, I was involved in building an EVA work platform that was designed before the first shuttle flight to be used before reentry. A crew member would use it to inspect and repair any tiles that had been lost during liftoff. We built and tested the platform in the weightless simulator at JSC, but before the first shuttle flight, NASA determined that the tiles would be secure and remain in place during liftoff and flight, so the platform was never flown.






            share|improve this answer





















            • If this is a comment, it should be posted as one, but not as an answer.
              – Uwe
              8 hours ago






            • 2




              this has very little to do with this question, as far as I can see.
              – JCRM
              5 hours ago










            • This is a great bit of space history! When you reach 50 reputation (points) you'll be able to post comments on other people's posts. Until then, note that Stack Exchange has a fairly rigid definition of question and answer posts. Since this is a comment, it shouldn't appear as an answer to the question. You can learn more in the help center and if you have a minute, you can take the tour. Welcome to Stack Exchange!
              – uhoh
              1 hour ago












            up vote
            0
            down vote










            up vote
            0
            down vote









            Just a comment:
            If you remember, a shuttle (STS 107) was lost over Texas during reentry because some ablative tiles had been knocked off during lift-off. Reentry heat damaged the unprotected structure resulting in the shuttle being torn apart.
            As a Grumman employee, I was involved in building an EVA work platform that was designed before the first shuttle flight to be used before reentry. A crew member would use it to inspect and repair any tiles that had been lost during liftoff. We built and tested the platform in the weightless simulator at JSC, but before the first shuttle flight, NASA determined that the tiles would be secure and remain in place during liftoff and flight, so the platform was never flown.






            share|improve this answer













            Just a comment:
            If you remember, a shuttle (STS 107) was lost over Texas during reentry because some ablative tiles had been knocked off during lift-off. Reentry heat damaged the unprotected structure resulting in the shuttle being torn apart.
            As a Grumman employee, I was involved in building an EVA work platform that was designed before the first shuttle flight to be used before reentry. A crew member would use it to inspect and repair any tiles that had been lost during liftoff. We built and tested the platform in the weightless simulator at JSC, but before the first shuttle flight, NASA determined that the tiles would be secure and remain in place during liftoff and flight, so the platform was never flown.







            share|improve this answer













            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer











            answered 9 hours ago









            bgseib

            92




            92











            • If this is a comment, it should be posted as one, but not as an answer.
              – Uwe
              8 hours ago






            • 2




              this has very little to do with this question, as far as I can see.
              – JCRM
              5 hours ago










            • This is a great bit of space history! When you reach 50 reputation (points) you'll be able to post comments on other people's posts. Until then, note that Stack Exchange has a fairly rigid definition of question and answer posts. Since this is a comment, it shouldn't appear as an answer to the question. You can learn more in the help center and if you have a minute, you can take the tour. Welcome to Stack Exchange!
              – uhoh
              1 hour ago
















            • If this is a comment, it should be posted as one, but not as an answer.
              – Uwe
              8 hours ago






            • 2




              this has very little to do with this question, as far as I can see.
              – JCRM
              5 hours ago










            • This is a great bit of space history! When you reach 50 reputation (points) you'll be able to post comments on other people's posts. Until then, note that Stack Exchange has a fairly rigid definition of question and answer posts. Since this is a comment, it shouldn't appear as an answer to the question. You can learn more in the help center and if you have a minute, you can take the tour. Welcome to Stack Exchange!
              – uhoh
              1 hour ago















            If this is a comment, it should be posted as one, but not as an answer.
            – Uwe
            8 hours ago




            If this is a comment, it should be posted as one, but not as an answer.
            – Uwe
            8 hours ago




            2




            2




            this has very little to do with this question, as far as I can see.
            – JCRM
            5 hours ago




            this has very little to do with this question, as far as I can see.
            – JCRM
            5 hours ago












            This is a great bit of space history! When you reach 50 reputation (points) you'll be able to post comments on other people's posts. Until then, note that Stack Exchange has a fairly rigid definition of question and answer posts. Since this is a comment, it shouldn't appear as an answer to the question. You can learn more in the help center and if you have a minute, you can take the tour. Welcome to Stack Exchange!
            – uhoh
            1 hour ago




            This is a great bit of space history! When you reach 50 reputation (points) you'll be able to post comments on other people's posts. Until then, note that Stack Exchange has a fairly rigid definition of question and answer posts. Since this is a comment, it shouldn't appear as an answer to the question. You can learn more in the help center and if you have a minute, you can take the tour. Welcome to Stack Exchange!
            – uhoh
            1 hour ago












             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30155%2fwhy-didn-t-the-spacecraft-used-for-the-apollo-11-mission-melt-in-the-earth-s-atm%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest














































































            Popular posts from this blog

            ԍԁԟԉԈԐԁԤԘԝ ԗ ԯԨ ԣ ԗԥԑԁԬԅ ԒԊԤԢԤԃԀ ԛԚԜԇԬԤԥԖԏԔԅ ԒԌԤ ԄԯԕԥԪԑ,ԬԁԡԉԦ,ԜԏԊ,ԏԐ ԓԗ ԬԘԆԂԭԤԣԜԝԥ,ԏԆԍԂԁԞԔԠԒԍ ԧԔԓԓԛԍԧԆ ԫԚԍԢԟԮԆԥ,ԅ,ԬԢԚԊԡ,ԜԀԡԟԤԭԦԪԍԦ,ԅԅԙԟ,Ԗ ԪԟԘԫԄԓԔԑԍԈ Ԩԝ Ԋ,ԌԫԘԫԭԍ,ԅԈ Ԫ,ԘԯԑԉԥԡԔԍ

            How to change the default border color of fbox? [duplicate]

            Henj