Why didnâÂÂt the Spacecraft used for the Apollo 11 mission melt in the EarthâÂÂs Atmosphere?
up vote
21
down vote
favorite
My brother has recently been converted to a Flat Earther and is convinced that something that proves his theory is the moon landings being faked by NASA. I have managed to counter argue the majority of his points, however yesterday he sent me a video which showed the various layers of the EarthâÂÂs atmosphere. The thermosphere in particular has temperatures that reach upto around 1500 Celsius. My research shows the majority of the Apollo 11 Spacecraft was made from an aluminium alloy, which has a melting point of 660.03 Celsius so I wondered how did it not melt whilst going through the atmosphere?
I am sorry if this is an obvious question/answer but I havenâÂÂt been able to find a good answer and I need something to stop him from going on about it! Thanks to anyone for any help.
the-moon apollo-program reentry atmosphere apollo-11
 |Â
show 13 more comments
up vote
21
down vote
favorite
My brother has recently been converted to a Flat Earther and is convinced that something that proves his theory is the moon landings being faked by NASA. I have managed to counter argue the majority of his points, however yesterday he sent me a video which showed the various layers of the EarthâÂÂs atmosphere. The thermosphere in particular has temperatures that reach upto around 1500 Celsius. My research shows the majority of the Apollo 11 Spacecraft was made from an aluminium alloy, which has a melting point of 660.03 Celsius so I wondered how did it not melt whilst going through the atmosphere?
I am sorry if this is an obvious question/answer but I havenâÂÂt been able to find a good answer and I need something to stop him from going on about it! Thanks to anyone for any help.
the-moon apollo-program reentry atmosphere apollo-11
19
The important thing to note is that 'melting point' is the temperature that the material itself needs to be in order to melt.
â Jack
yesterday
19
I am probably going to be very sorry for even asking this question, but ⦠Why exactly does the Moon Landing being faked prove the Earth is Flat? Why would the Earth care whether Neil Armstrong stepped on the Moon or a studio in North Hollywood?
â Jörg W Mittag
yesterday
4
@JörgWMittag - It's not that the Moon landing being faked proves the Earth is flat, but rather that a flat Earth means that the Moon landings had to have been faked. Flat Earth is possibly the most dangerous religion there is.
â David Hammen
yesterday
4
You might also want to look at our canonical response to Moon landing deniers which also talks about flat earth a little: space.stackexchange.com/questions/28172/â¦
â Organic Marble
yesterday
5
@Carl - You're using logic. I'm not sure that's a productive tactic with the Flat-Earthers. :(
â Don Branson
yesterday
 |Â
show 13 more comments
up vote
21
down vote
favorite
up vote
21
down vote
favorite
My brother has recently been converted to a Flat Earther and is convinced that something that proves his theory is the moon landings being faked by NASA. I have managed to counter argue the majority of his points, however yesterday he sent me a video which showed the various layers of the EarthâÂÂs atmosphere. The thermosphere in particular has temperatures that reach upto around 1500 Celsius. My research shows the majority of the Apollo 11 Spacecraft was made from an aluminium alloy, which has a melting point of 660.03 Celsius so I wondered how did it not melt whilst going through the atmosphere?
I am sorry if this is an obvious question/answer but I havenâÂÂt been able to find a good answer and I need something to stop him from going on about it! Thanks to anyone for any help.
the-moon apollo-program reentry atmosphere apollo-11
My brother has recently been converted to a Flat Earther and is convinced that something that proves his theory is the moon landings being faked by NASA. I have managed to counter argue the majority of his points, however yesterday he sent me a video which showed the various layers of the EarthâÂÂs atmosphere. The thermosphere in particular has temperatures that reach upto around 1500 Celsius. My research shows the majority of the Apollo 11 Spacecraft was made from an aluminium alloy, which has a melting point of 660.03 Celsius so I wondered how did it not melt whilst going through the atmosphere?
I am sorry if this is an obvious question/answer but I havenâÂÂt been able to find a good answer and I need something to stop him from going on about it! Thanks to anyone for any help.
the-moon apollo-program reentry atmosphere apollo-11
edited yesterday
Nathan Tuggy
3,16142135
3,16142135
asked yesterday
Allroundguy22
10613
10613
19
The important thing to note is that 'melting point' is the temperature that the material itself needs to be in order to melt.
â Jack
yesterday
19
I am probably going to be very sorry for even asking this question, but ⦠Why exactly does the Moon Landing being faked prove the Earth is Flat? Why would the Earth care whether Neil Armstrong stepped on the Moon or a studio in North Hollywood?
â Jörg W Mittag
yesterday
4
@JörgWMittag - It's not that the Moon landing being faked proves the Earth is flat, but rather that a flat Earth means that the Moon landings had to have been faked. Flat Earth is possibly the most dangerous religion there is.
â David Hammen
yesterday
4
You might also want to look at our canonical response to Moon landing deniers which also talks about flat earth a little: space.stackexchange.com/questions/28172/â¦
â Organic Marble
yesterday
5
@Carl - You're using logic. I'm not sure that's a productive tactic with the Flat-Earthers. :(
â Don Branson
yesterday
 |Â
show 13 more comments
19
The important thing to note is that 'melting point' is the temperature that the material itself needs to be in order to melt.
â Jack
yesterday
19
I am probably going to be very sorry for even asking this question, but ⦠Why exactly does the Moon Landing being faked prove the Earth is Flat? Why would the Earth care whether Neil Armstrong stepped on the Moon or a studio in North Hollywood?
â Jörg W Mittag
yesterday
4
@JörgWMittag - It's not that the Moon landing being faked proves the Earth is flat, but rather that a flat Earth means that the Moon landings had to have been faked. Flat Earth is possibly the most dangerous religion there is.
â David Hammen
yesterday
4
You might also want to look at our canonical response to Moon landing deniers which also talks about flat earth a little: space.stackexchange.com/questions/28172/â¦
â Organic Marble
yesterday
5
@Carl - You're using logic. I'm not sure that's a productive tactic with the Flat-Earthers. :(
â Don Branson
yesterday
19
19
The important thing to note is that 'melting point' is the temperature that the material itself needs to be in order to melt.
â Jack
yesterday
The important thing to note is that 'melting point' is the temperature that the material itself needs to be in order to melt.
â Jack
yesterday
19
19
I am probably going to be very sorry for even asking this question, but ⦠Why exactly does the Moon Landing being faked prove the Earth is Flat? Why would the Earth care whether Neil Armstrong stepped on the Moon or a studio in North Hollywood?
â Jörg W Mittag
yesterday
I am probably going to be very sorry for even asking this question, but ⦠Why exactly does the Moon Landing being faked prove the Earth is Flat? Why would the Earth care whether Neil Armstrong stepped on the Moon or a studio in North Hollywood?
â Jörg W Mittag
yesterday
4
4
@JörgWMittag - It's not that the Moon landing being faked proves the Earth is flat, but rather that a flat Earth means that the Moon landings had to have been faked. Flat Earth is possibly the most dangerous religion there is.
â David Hammen
yesterday
@JörgWMittag - It's not that the Moon landing being faked proves the Earth is flat, but rather that a flat Earth means that the Moon landings had to have been faked. Flat Earth is possibly the most dangerous religion there is.
â David Hammen
yesterday
4
4
You might also want to look at our canonical response to Moon landing deniers which also talks about flat earth a little: space.stackexchange.com/questions/28172/â¦
â Organic Marble
yesterday
You might also want to look at our canonical response to Moon landing deniers which also talks about flat earth a little: space.stackexchange.com/questions/28172/â¦
â Organic Marble
yesterday
5
5
@Carl - You're using logic. I'm not sure that's a productive tactic with the Flat-Earthers. :(
â Don Branson
yesterday
@Carl - You're using logic. I'm not sure that's a productive tactic with the Flat-Earthers. :(
â Don Branson
yesterday
 |Â
show 13 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
48
down vote
Although the temperature at altitude CAN be several thousands of degrees, the atmosphere is so thin it does not transfer heat efficiently. Wikipedia explains it very well -
The highly diluted gas in this layer can reach 2,500 ðC (4,530 ðF) during the day. Even though the temperature is so high, one would not feel warm in the thermosphere, because it is so near vacuum that there is not enough contact with the few atoms of gas to transfer much heat. A normal thermometer might indicate significantly below 0 ðC (32 ðF), at least at night, because the energy lost by thermal radiation would exceed the energy acquired from the atmospheric gas by direct contact
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermosphere
The high temperatures experienced travelling out of and back into the atmosphere are those of greatest concern, particularly the latter. On ascent they are high but comfortably within the parameters of modern materials because the craft are travelling relatively slowly in the thicker atmosphere and faster when the atmosphere thins/becomes vaccuum. On descent, i.e. re-entry, the shockwave caused by spacecraft colliding with atoms in the air causes the air to compress, which in turn creates heat. It is NOT due to friction. If you want to see the same effect on a smaller scale, take a deflated football and pump it up as fast as you can, the quickly feel the nozzle of your pump. It will be hot, because the compression of air causing heat has transferred to the nozzle.
Flat earth is an unfortunate belief at odds with mountains of evidence. Sorry to hear your brother has fallen for it.
I suspect that even providing evidence will not be sufficient to dissuade him, based on my own experience of flat-earthers.
7
@gerrit: Actually, it is. Flat Earthers believe that Round Earth Theory is a conspiracy by the world-government, invented in order to keep us under control. Now, I have no idea why wrongly believing that the Earth is round would keep us under control, but that's what they believe. (At least, ChemTrailers have a sort-of twisted internally consistent logic, in that spraying mind-control drugs into the atmosphere could in some extremely convoluted way and ignoring the fact that the drugs would be too diluted to have any effect, be used for ⦠you know ⦠mind-control.)
â Jörg W Mittag
yesterday
6
@gerrit - To double down on what Jörg wrote, flat Earth is the biggest conspiracy theory of all. The cabal who promulgate round earthism has been in charge for over two thousand years. All of the science teachers on the planet, along with all scientists, everyone who claims to have traveled to Antarctica or around the world are either part of the cabal or have been completely ensnared by it. Some conspiracies turn out to be true. The life span of a true conspiracy is inversely proportional to the number of conspirators. This one is so huge it couldn't last a second.
â David Hammen
yesterday
Why does air compression cause heat?
â opa
yesterday
2
@opa - not specifically "air", but compression of any gas. Compressing the gas makes the molecules come closer together and bump into each other more frequently. Like an air conditioner, compress the gas (Freon) to basically a liquid and it heats up. Remove the heat with a coil and a fan (outdoors). Then send the now cooled/warm liquid back (indoors) to another coil/fan where the Freon is now expanded, which makes everything very cold. --->
â Kevin Fegan
yesterday
1
@opa - (continued) - Gay-Lussac's Law: The Pressure Temperature Law. This law states that the pressure of a given amount of gas held at constant volume is directly proportional to the Kelvin temperature. As the pressure goes up, the temperature also goes up, and vice-versa.
â Kevin Fegan
yesterday
 |Â
show 4 more comments
up vote
23
down vote
It's not the temperature that matters, it's the heat transfer.
The density of the atmosphere up in the thermosphere is very very thin. There simply isn't nearly enough mass to transfer any significant amount of heat from the thermosphere to a spacecraft travelling through it.
Spacecraft do need heat protection to survive re-entry, but that is because they're travelling so fast relative to the surrounding medium, not because of the temperature of the tenuous atmosphere that the medium consists of.
2
A somewhat related recent question
â Jack
yesterday
5
To illustrate the importance of material density in transferring heat, touching water at 70C will produce third-degree burns almost immediately. But you can heat your oven to 250C and stick your hand in for a remarkably long time without injury.
â Mark
yesterday
2
You probably meant to say, don't try this at home! If you touch any part of the metal frame of the oven with your hand, you'll get burned instantly. It's only the air in a heated oven that is not immediately dangerous: the metal parts are EXTREMELY dangerous at that temperature.
â Ed999
yesterday
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
As 'SF' mentioned; the capsule was insulated with an ablative cover. You can read about it in NASA's document: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19740007423.pdf
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Just a comment:
If you remember, a shuttle (STS 107) was lost over Texas during reentry because some ablative tiles had been knocked off during lift-off. Reentry heat damaged the unprotected structure resulting in the shuttle being torn apart.
As a Grumman employee, I was involved in building an EVA work platform that was designed before the first shuttle flight to be used before reentry. A crew member would use it to inspect and repair any tiles that had been lost during liftoff. We built and tested the platform in the weightless simulator at JSC, but before the first shuttle flight, NASA determined that the tiles would be secure and remain in place during liftoff and flight, so the platform was never flown.
If this is a comment, it should be posted as one, but not as an answer.
â Uwe
8 hours ago
2
this has very little to do with this question, as far as I can see.
â JCRM
5 hours ago
This is a great bit of space history! When you reach 50 reputation (points) you'll be able to post comments on other people's posts. Until then, note that Stack Exchange has a fairly rigid definition of question and answer posts. Since this is a comment, it shouldn't appear as an answer to the question. You can learn more in the help center and if you have a minute, you can take the tour. Welcome to Stack Exchange!
â uhoh
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
48
down vote
Although the temperature at altitude CAN be several thousands of degrees, the atmosphere is so thin it does not transfer heat efficiently. Wikipedia explains it very well -
The highly diluted gas in this layer can reach 2,500 ðC (4,530 ðF) during the day. Even though the temperature is so high, one would not feel warm in the thermosphere, because it is so near vacuum that there is not enough contact with the few atoms of gas to transfer much heat. A normal thermometer might indicate significantly below 0 ðC (32 ðF), at least at night, because the energy lost by thermal radiation would exceed the energy acquired from the atmospheric gas by direct contact
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermosphere
The high temperatures experienced travelling out of and back into the atmosphere are those of greatest concern, particularly the latter. On ascent they are high but comfortably within the parameters of modern materials because the craft are travelling relatively slowly in the thicker atmosphere and faster when the atmosphere thins/becomes vaccuum. On descent, i.e. re-entry, the shockwave caused by spacecraft colliding with atoms in the air causes the air to compress, which in turn creates heat. It is NOT due to friction. If you want to see the same effect on a smaller scale, take a deflated football and pump it up as fast as you can, the quickly feel the nozzle of your pump. It will be hot, because the compression of air causing heat has transferred to the nozzle.
Flat earth is an unfortunate belief at odds with mountains of evidence. Sorry to hear your brother has fallen for it.
I suspect that even providing evidence will not be sufficient to dissuade him, based on my own experience of flat-earthers.
7
@gerrit: Actually, it is. Flat Earthers believe that Round Earth Theory is a conspiracy by the world-government, invented in order to keep us under control. Now, I have no idea why wrongly believing that the Earth is round would keep us under control, but that's what they believe. (At least, ChemTrailers have a sort-of twisted internally consistent logic, in that spraying mind-control drugs into the atmosphere could in some extremely convoluted way and ignoring the fact that the drugs would be too diluted to have any effect, be used for ⦠you know ⦠mind-control.)
â Jörg W Mittag
yesterday
6
@gerrit - To double down on what Jörg wrote, flat Earth is the biggest conspiracy theory of all. The cabal who promulgate round earthism has been in charge for over two thousand years. All of the science teachers on the planet, along with all scientists, everyone who claims to have traveled to Antarctica or around the world are either part of the cabal or have been completely ensnared by it. Some conspiracies turn out to be true. The life span of a true conspiracy is inversely proportional to the number of conspirators. This one is so huge it couldn't last a second.
â David Hammen
yesterday
Why does air compression cause heat?
â opa
yesterday
2
@opa - not specifically "air", but compression of any gas. Compressing the gas makes the molecules come closer together and bump into each other more frequently. Like an air conditioner, compress the gas (Freon) to basically a liquid and it heats up. Remove the heat with a coil and a fan (outdoors). Then send the now cooled/warm liquid back (indoors) to another coil/fan where the Freon is now expanded, which makes everything very cold. --->
â Kevin Fegan
yesterday
1
@opa - (continued) - Gay-Lussac's Law: The Pressure Temperature Law. This law states that the pressure of a given amount of gas held at constant volume is directly proportional to the Kelvin temperature. As the pressure goes up, the temperature also goes up, and vice-versa.
â Kevin Fegan
yesterday
 |Â
show 4 more comments
up vote
48
down vote
Although the temperature at altitude CAN be several thousands of degrees, the atmosphere is so thin it does not transfer heat efficiently. Wikipedia explains it very well -
The highly diluted gas in this layer can reach 2,500 ðC (4,530 ðF) during the day. Even though the temperature is so high, one would not feel warm in the thermosphere, because it is so near vacuum that there is not enough contact with the few atoms of gas to transfer much heat. A normal thermometer might indicate significantly below 0 ðC (32 ðF), at least at night, because the energy lost by thermal radiation would exceed the energy acquired from the atmospheric gas by direct contact
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermosphere
The high temperatures experienced travelling out of and back into the atmosphere are those of greatest concern, particularly the latter. On ascent they are high but comfortably within the parameters of modern materials because the craft are travelling relatively slowly in the thicker atmosphere and faster when the atmosphere thins/becomes vaccuum. On descent, i.e. re-entry, the shockwave caused by spacecraft colliding with atoms in the air causes the air to compress, which in turn creates heat. It is NOT due to friction. If you want to see the same effect on a smaller scale, take a deflated football and pump it up as fast as you can, the quickly feel the nozzle of your pump. It will be hot, because the compression of air causing heat has transferred to the nozzle.
Flat earth is an unfortunate belief at odds with mountains of evidence. Sorry to hear your brother has fallen for it.
I suspect that even providing evidence will not be sufficient to dissuade him, based on my own experience of flat-earthers.
7
@gerrit: Actually, it is. Flat Earthers believe that Round Earth Theory is a conspiracy by the world-government, invented in order to keep us under control. Now, I have no idea why wrongly believing that the Earth is round would keep us under control, but that's what they believe. (At least, ChemTrailers have a sort-of twisted internally consistent logic, in that spraying mind-control drugs into the atmosphere could in some extremely convoluted way and ignoring the fact that the drugs would be too diluted to have any effect, be used for ⦠you know ⦠mind-control.)
â Jörg W Mittag
yesterday
6
@gerrit - To double down on what Jörg wrote, flat Earth is the biggest conspiracy theory of all. The cabal who promulgate round earthism has been in charge for over two thousand years. All of the science teachers on the planet, along with all scientists, everyone who claims to have traveled to Antarctica or around the world are either part of the cabal or have been completely ensnared by it. Some conspiracies turn out to be true. The life span of a true conspiracy is inversely proportional to the number of conspirators. This one is so huge it couldn't last a second.
â David Hammen
yesterday
Why does air compression cause heat?
â opa
yesterday
2
@opa - not specifically "air", but compression of any gas. Compressing the gas makes the molecules come closer together and bump into each other more frequently. Like an air conditioner, compress the gas (Freon) to basically a liquid and it heats up. Remove the heat with a coil and a fan (outdoors). Then send the now cooled/warm liquid back (indoors) to another coil/fan where the Freon is now expanded, which makes everything very cold. --->
â Kevin Fegan
yesterday
1
@opa - (continued) - Gay-Lussac's Law: The Pressure Temperature Law. This law states that the pressure of a given amount of gas held at constant volume is directly proportional to the Kelvin temperature. As the pressure goes up, the temperature also goes up, and vice-versa.
â Kevin Fegan
yesterday
 |Â
show 4 more comments
up vote
48
down vote
up vote
48
down vote
Although the temperature at altitude CAN be several thousands of degrees, the atmosphere is so thin it does not transfer heat efficiently. Wikipedia explains it very well -
The highly diluted gas in this layer can reach 2,500 ðC (4,530 ðF) during the day. Even though the temperature is so high, one would not feel warm in the thermosphere, because it is so near vacuum that there is not enough contact with the few atoms of gas to transfer much heat. A normal thermometer might indicate significantly below 0 ðC (32 ðF), at least at night, because the energy lost by thermal radiation would exceed the energy acquired from the atmospheric gas by direct contact
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermosphere
The high temperatures experienced travelling out of and back into the atmosphere are those of greatest concern, particularly the latter. On ascent they are high but comfortably within the parameters of modern materials because the craft are travelling relatively slowly in the thicker atmosphere and faster when the atmosphere thins/becomes vaccuum. On descent, i.e. re-entry, the shockwave caused by spacecraft colliding with atoms in the air causes the air to compress, which in turn creates heat. It is NOT due to friction. If you want to see the same effect on a smaller scale, take a deflated football and pump it up as fast as you can, the quickly feel the nozzle of your pump. It will be hot, because the compression of air causing heat has transferred to the nozzle.
Flat earth is an unfortunate belief at odds with mountains of evidence. Sorry to hear your brother has fallen for it.
I suspect that even providing evidence will not be sufficient to dissuade him, based on my own experience of flat-earthers.
Although the temperature at altitude CAN be several thousands of degrees, the atmosphere is so thin it does not transfer heat efficiently. Wikipedia explains it very well -
The highly diluted gas in this layer can reach 2,500 ðC (4,530 ðF) during the day. Even though the temperature is so high, one would not feel warm in the thermosphere, because it is so near vacuum that there is not enough contact with the few atoms of gas to transfer much heat. A normal thermometer might indicate significantly below 0 ðC (32 ðF), at least at night, because the energy lost by thermal radiation would exceed the energy acquired from the atmospheric gas by direct contact
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermosphere
The high temperatures experienced travelling out of and back into the atmosphere are those of greatest concern, particularly the latter. On ascent they are high but comfortably within the parameters of modern materials because the craft are travelling relatively slowly in the thicker atmosphere and faster when the atmosphere thins/becomes vaccuum. On descent, i.e. re-entry, the shockwave caused by spacecraft colliding with atoms in the air causes the air to compress, which in turn creates heat. It is NOT due to friction. If you want to see the same effect on a smaller scale, take a deflated football and pump it up as fast as you can, the quickly feel the nozzle of your pump. It will be hot, because the compression of air causing heat has transferred to the nozzle.
Flat earth is an unfortunate belief at odds with mountains of evidence. Sorry to hear your brother has fallen for it.
I suspect that even providing evidence will not be sufficient to dissuade him, based on my own experience of flat-earthers.
edited yesterday
called2voyageâ¦
14.7k665121
14.7k665121
answered yesterday
david_c
55917
55917
7
@gerrit: Actually, it is. Flat Earthers believe that Round Earth Theory is a conspiracy by the world-government, invented in order to keep us under control. Now, I have no idea why wrongly believing that the Earth is round would keep us under control, but that's what they believe. (At least, ChemTrailers have a sort-of twisted internally consistent logic, in that spraying mind-control drugs into the atmosphere could in some extremely convoluted way and ignoring the fact that the drugs would be too diluted to have any effect, be used for ⦠you know ⦠mind-control.)
â Jörg W Mittag
yesterday
6
@gerrit - To double down on what Jörg wrote, flat Earth is the biggest conspiracy theory of all. The cabal who promulgate round earthism has been in charge for over two thousand years. All of the science teachers on the planet, along with all scientists, everyone who claims to have traveled to Antarctica or around the world are either part of the cabal or have been completely ensnared by it. Some conspiracies turn out to be true. The life span of a true conspiracy is inversely proportional to the number of conspirators. This one is so huge it couldn't last a second.
â David Hammen
yesterday
Why does air compression cause heat?
â opa
yesterday
2
@opa - not specifically "air", but compression of any gas. Compressing the gas makes the molecules come closer together and bump into each other more frequently. Like an air conditioner, compress the gas (Freon) to basically a liquid and it heats up. Remove the heat with a coil and a fan (outdoors). Then send the now cooled/warm liquid back (indoors) to another coil/fan where the Freon is now expanded, which makes everything very cold. --->
â Kevin Fegan
yesterday
1
@opa - (continued) - Gay-Lussac's Law: The Pressure Temperature Law. This law states that the pressure of a given amount of gas held at constant volume is directly proportional to the Kelvin temperature. As the pressure goes up, the temperature also goes up, and vice-versa.
â Kevin Fegan
yesterday
 |Â
show 4 more comments
7
@gerrit: Actually, it is. Flat Earthers believe that Round Earth Theory is a conspiracy by the world-government, invented in order to keep us under control. Now, I have no idea why wrongly believing that the Earth is round would keep us under control, but that's what they believe. (At least, ChemTrailers have a sort-of twisted internally consistent logic, in that spraying mind-control drugs into the atmosphere could in some extremely convoluted way and ignoring the fact that the drugs would be too diluted to have any effect, be used for ⦠you know ⦠mind-control.)
â Jörg W Mittag
yesterday
6
@gerrit - To double down on what Jörg wrote, flat Earth is the biggest conspiracy theory of all. The cabal who promulgate round earthism has been in charge for over two thousand years. All of the science teachers on the planet, along with all scientists, everyone who claims to have traveled to Antarctica or around the world are either part of the cabal or have been completely ensnared by it. Some conspiracies turn out to be true. The life span of a true conspiracy is inversely proportional to the number of conspirators. This one is so huge it couldn't last a second.
â David Hammen
yesterday
Why does air compression cause heat?
â opa
yesterday
2
@opa - not specifically "air", but compression of any gas. Compressing the gas makes the molecules come closer together and bump into each other more frequently. Like an air conditioner, compress the gas (Freon) to basically a liquid and it heats up. Remove the heat with a coil and a fan (outdoors). Then send the now cooled/warm liquid back (indoors) to another coil/fan where the Freon is now expanded, which makes everything very cold. --->
â Kevin Fegan
yesterday
1
@opa - (continued) - Gay-Lussac's Law: The Pressure Temperature Law. This law states that the pressure of a given amount of gas held at constant volume is directly proportional to the Kelvin temperature. As the pressure goes up, the temperature also goes up, and vice-versa.
â Kevin Fegan
yesterday
7
7
@gerrit: Actually, it is. Flat Earthers believe that Round Earth Theory is a conspiracy by the world-government, invented in order to keep us under control. Now, I have no idea why wrongly believing that the Earth is round would keep us under control, but that's what they believe. (At least, ChemTrailers have a sort-of twisted internally consistent logic, in that spraying mind-control drugs into the atmosphere could in some extremely convoluted way and ignoring the fact that the drugs would be too diluted to have any effect, be used for ⦠you know ⦠mind-control.)
â Jörg W Mittag
yesterday
@gerrit: Actually, it is. Flat Earthers believe that Round Earth Theory is a conspiracy by the world-government, invented in order to keep us under control. Now, I have no idea why wrongly believing that the Earth is round would keep us under control, but that's what they believe. (At least, ChemTrailers have a sort-of twisted internally consistent logic, in that spraying mind-control drugs into the atmosphere could in some extremely convoluted way and ignoring the fact that the drugs would be too diluted to have any effect, be used for ⦠you know ⦠mind-control.)
â Jörg W Mittag
yesterday
6
6
@gerrit - To double down on what Jörg wrote, flat Earth is the biggest conspiracy theory of all. The cabal who promulgate round earthism has been in charge for over two thousand years. All of the science teachers on the planet, along with all scientists, everyone who claims to have traveled to Antarctica or around the world are either part of the cabal or have been completely ensnared by it. Some conspiracies turn out to be true. The life span of a true conspiracy is inversely proportional to the number of conspirators. This one is so huge it couldn't last a second.
â David Hammen
yesterday
@gerrit - To double down on what Jörg wrote, flat Earth is the biggest conspiracy theory of all. The cabal who promulgate round earthism has been in charge for over two thousand years. All of the science teachers on the planet, along with all scientists, everyone who claims to have traveled to Antarctica or around the world are either part of the cabal or have been completely ensnared by it. Some conspiracies turn out to be true. The life span of a true conspiracy is inversely proportional to the number of conspirators. This one is so huge it couldn't last a second.
â David Hammen
yesterday
Why does air compression cause heat?
â opa
yesterday
Why does air compression cause heat?
â opa
yesterday
2
2
@opa - not specifically "air", but compression of any gas. Compressing the gas makes the molecules come closer together and bump into each other more frequently. Like an air conditioner, compress the gas (Freon) to basically a liquid and it heats up. Remove the heat with a coil and a fan (outdoors). Then send the now cooled/warm liquid back (indoors) to another coil/fan where the Freon is now expanded, which makes everything very cold. --->
â Kevin Fegan
yesterday
@opa - not specifically "air", but compression of any gas. Compressing the gas makes the molecules come closer together and bump into each other more frequently. Like an air conditioner, compress the gas (Freon) to basically a liquid and it heats up. Remove the heat with a coil and a fan (outdoors). Then send the now cooled/warm liquid back (indoors) to another coil/fan where the Freon is now expanded, which makes everything very cold. --->
â Kevin Fegan
yesterday
1
1
@opa - (continued) - Gay-Lussac's Law: The Pressure Temperature Law. This law states that the pressure of a given amount of gas held at constant volume is directly proportional to the Kelvin temperature. As the pressure goes up, the temperature also goes up, and vice-versa.
â Kevin Fegan
yesterday
@opa - (continued) - Gay-Lussac's Law: The Pressure Temperature Law. This law states that the pressure of a given amount of gas held at constant volume is directly proportional to the Kelvin temperature. As the pressure goes up, the temperature also goes up, and vice-versa.
â Kevin Fegan
yesterday
 |Â
show 4 more comments
up vote
23
down vote
It's not the temperature that matters, it's the heat transfer.
The density of the atmosphere up in the thermosphere is very very thin. There simply isn't nearly enough mass to transfer any significant amount of heat from the thermosphere to a spacecraft travelling through it.
Spacecraft do need heat protection to survive re-entry, but that is because they're travelling so fast relative to the surrounding medium, not because of the temperature of the tenuous atmosphere that the medium consists of.
2
A somewhat related recent question
â Jack
yesterday
5
To illustrate the importance of material density in transferring heat, touching water at 70C will produce third-degree burns almost immediately. But you can heat your oven to 250C and stick your hand in for a remarkably long time without injury.
â Mark
yesterday
2
You probably meant to say, don't try this at home! If you touch any part of the metal frame of the oven with your hand, you'll get burned instantly. It's only the air in a heated oven that is not immediately dangerous: the metal parts are EXTREMELY dangerous at that temperature.
â Ed999
yesterday
add a comment |Â
up vote
23
down vote
It's not the temperature that matters, it's the heat transfer.
The density of the atmosphere up in the thermosphere is very very thin. There simply isn't nearly enough mass to transfer any significant amount of heat from the thermosphere to a spacecraft travelling through it.
Spacecraft do need heat protection to survive re-entry, but that is because they're travelling so fast relative to the surrounding medium, not because of the temperature of the tenuous atmosphere that the medium consists of.
2
A somewhat related recent question
â Jack
yesterday
5
To illustrate the importance of material density in transferring heat, touching water at 70C will produce third-degree burns almost immediately. But you can heat your oven to 250C and stick your hand in for a remarkably long time without injury.
â Mark
yesterday
2
You probably meant to say, don't try this at home! If you touch any part of the metal frame of the oven with your hand, you'll get burned instantly. It's only the air in a heated oven that is not immediately dangerous: the metal parts are EXTREMELY dangerous at that temperature.
â Ed999
yesterday
add a comment |Â
up vote
23
down vote
up vote
23
down vote
It's not the temperature that matters, it's the heat transfer.
The density of the atmosphere up in the thermosphere is very very thin. There simply isn't nearly enough mass to transfer any significant amount of heat from the thermosphere to a spacecraft travelling through it.
Spacecraft do need heat protection to survive re-entry, but that is because they're travelling so fast relative to the surrounding medium, not because of the temperature of the tenuous atmosphere that the medium consists of.
It's not the temperature that matters, it's the heat transfer.
The density of the atmosphere up in the thermosphere is very very thin. There simply isn't nearly enough mass to transfer any significant amount of heat from the thermosphere to a spacecraft travelling through it.
Spacecraft do need heat protection to survive re-entry, but that is because they're travelling so fast relative to the surrounding medium, not because of the temperature of the tenuous atmosphere that the medium consists of.
answered yesterday
gerrit
5,8332565
5,8332565
2
A somewhat related recent question
â Jack
yesterday
5
To illustrate the importance of material density in transferring heat, touching water at 70C will produce third-degree burns almost immediately. But you can heat your oven to 250C and stick your hand in for a remarkably long time without injury.
â Mark
yesterday
2
You probably meant to say, don't try this at home! If you touch any part of the metal frame of the oven with your hand, you'll get burned instantly. It's only the air in a heated oven that is not immediately dangerous: the metal parts are EXTREMELY dangerous at that temperature.
â Ed999
yesterday
add a comment |Â
2
A somewhat related recent question
â Jack
yesterday
5
To illustrate the importance of material density in transferring heat, touching water at 70C will produce third-degree burns almost immediately. But you can heat your oven to 250C and stick your hand in for a remarkably long time without injury.
â Mark
yesterday
2
You probably meant to say, don't try this at home! If you touch any part of the metal frame of the oven with your hand, you'll get burned instantly. It's only the air in a heated oven that is not immediately dangerous: the metal parts are EXTREMELY dangerous at that temperature.
â Ed999
yesterday
2
2
A somewhat related recent question
â Jack
yesterday
A somewhat related recent question
â Jack
yesterday
5
5
To illustrate the importance of material density in transferring heat, touching water at 70C will produce third-degree burns almost immediately. But you can heat your oven to 250C and stick your hand in for a remarkably long time without injury.
â Mark
yesterday
To illustrate the importance of material density in transferring heat, touching water at 70C will produce third-degree burns almost immediately. But you can heat your oven to 250C and stick your hand in for a remarkably long time without injury.
â Mark
yesterday
2
2
You probably meant to say, don't try this at home! If you touch any part of the metal frame of the oven with your hand, you'll get burned instantly. It's only the air in a heated oven that is not immediately dangerous: the metal parts are EXTREMELY dangerous at that temperature.
â Ed999
yesterday
You probably meant to say, don't try this at home! If you touch any part of the metal frame of the oven with your hand, you'll get burned instantly. It's only the air in a heated oven that is not immediately dangerous: the metal parts are EXTREMELY dangerous at that temperature.
â Ed999
yesterday
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
As 'SF' mentioned; the capsule was insulated with an ablative cover. You can read about it in NASA's document: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19740007423.pdf
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
As 'SF' mentioned; the capsule was insulated with an ablative cover. You can read about it in NASA's document: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19740007423.pdf
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
As 'SF' mentioned; the capsule was insulated with an ablative cover. You can read about it in NASA's document: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19740007423.pdf
As 'SF' mentioned; the capsule was insulated with an ablative cover. You can read about it in NASA's document: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19740007423.pdf
answered yesterday
CAM
111
111
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Just a comment:
If you remember, a shuttle (STS 107) was lost over Texas during reentry because some ablative tiles had been knocked off during lift-off. Reentry heat damaged the unprotected structure resulting in the shuttle being torn apart.
As a Grumman employee, I was involved in building an EVA work platform that was designed before the first shuttle flight to be used before reentry. A crew member would use it to inspect and repair any tiles that had been lost during liftoff. We built and tested the platform in the weightless simulator at JSC, but before the first shuttle flight, NASA determined that the tiles would be secure and remain in place during liftoff and flight, so the platform was never flown.
If this is a comment, it should be posted as one, but not as an answer.
â Uwe
8 hours ago
2
this has very little to do with this question, as far as I can see.
â JCRM
5 hours ago
This is a great bit of space history! When you reach 50 reputation (points) you'll be able to post comments on other people's posts. Until then, note that Stack Exchange has a fairly rigid definition of question and answer posts. Since this is a comment, it shouldn't appear as an answer to the question. You can learn more in the help center and if you have a minute, you can take the tour. Welcome to Stack Exchange!
â uhoh
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Just a comment:
If you remember, a shuttle (STS 107) was lost over Texas during reentry because some ablative tiles had been knocked off during lift-off. Reentry heat damaged the unprotected structure resulting in the shuttle being torn apart.
As a Grumman employee, I was involved in building an EVA work platform that was designed before the first shuttle flight to be used before reentry. A crew member would use it to inspect and repair any tiles that had been lost during liftoff. We built and tested the platform in the weightless simulator at JSC, but before the first shuttle flight, NASA determined that the tiles would be secure and remain in place during liftoff and flight, so the platform was never flown.
If this is a comment, it should be posted as one, but not as an answer.
â Uwe
8 hours ago
2
this has very little to do with this question, as far as I can see.
â JCRM
5 hours ago
This is a great bit of space history! When you reach 50 reputation (points) you'll be able to post comments on other people's posts. Until then, note that Stack Exchange has a fairly rigid definition of question and answer posts. Since this is a comment, it shouldn't appear as an answer to the question. You can learn more in the help center and if you have a minute, you can take the tour. Welcome to Stack Exchange!
â uhoh
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Just a comment:
If you remember, a shuttle (STS 107) was lost over Texas during reentry because some ablative tiles had been knocked off during lift-off. Reentry heat damaged the unprotected structure resulting in the shuttle being torn apart.
As a Grumman employee, I was involved in building an EVA work platform that was designed before the first shuttle flight to be used before reentry. A crew member would use it to inspect and repair any tiles that had been lost during liftoff. We built and tested the platform in the weightless simulator at JSC, but before the first shuttle flight, NASA determined that the tiles would be secure and remain in place during liftoff and flight, so the platform was never flown.
Just a comment:
If you remember, a shuttle (STS 107) was lost over Texas during reentry because some ablative tiles had been knocked off during lift-off. Reentry heat damaged the unprotected structure resulting in the shuttle being torn apart.
As a Grumman employee, I was involved in building an EVA work platform that was designed before the first shuttle flight to be used before reentry. A crew member would use it to inspect and repair any tiles that had been lost during liftoff. We built and tested the platform in the weightless simulator at JSC, but before the first shuttle flight, NASA determined that the tiles would be secure and remain in place during liftoff and flight, so the platform was never flown.
answered 9 hours ago
bgseib
92
92
If this is a comment, it should be posted as one, but not as an answer.
â Uwe
8 hours ago
2
this has very little to do with this question, as far as I can see.
â JCRM
5 hours ago
This is a great bit of space history! When you reach 50 reputation (points) you'll be able to post comments on other people's posts. Until then, note that Stack Exchange has a fairly rigid definition of question and answer posts. Since this is a comment, it shouldn't appear as an answer to the question. You can learn more in the help center and if you have a minute, you can take the tour. Welcome to Stack Exchange!
â uhoh
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
If this is a comment, it should be posted as one, but not as an answer.
â Uwe
8 hours ago
2
this has very little to do with this question, as far as I can see.
â JCRM
5 hours ago
This is a great bit of space history! When you reach 50 reputation (points) you'll be able to post comments on other people's posts. Until then, note that Stack Exchange has a fairly rigid definition of question and answer posts. Since this is a comment, it shouldn't appear as an answer to the question. You can learn more in the help center and if you have a minute, you can take the tour. Welcome to Stack Exchange!
â uhoh
1 hour ago
If this is a comment, it should be posted as one, but not as an answer.
â Uwe
8 hours ago
If this is a comment, it should be posted as one, but not as an answer.
â Uwe
8 hours ago
2
2
this has very little to do with this question, as far as I can see.
â JCRM
5 hours ago
this has very little to do with this question, as far as I can see.
â JCRM
5 hours ago
This is a great bit of space history! When you reach 50 reputation (points) you'll be able to post comments on other people's posts. Until then, note that Stack Exchange has a fairly rigid definition of question and answer posts. Since this is a comment, it shouldn't appear as an answer to the question. You can learn more in the help center and if you have a minute, you can take the tour. Welcome to Stack Exchange!
â uhoh
1 hour ago
This is a great bit of space history! When you reach 50 reputation (points) you'll be able to post comments on other people's posts. Until then, note that Stack Exchange has a fairly rigid definition of question and answer posts. Since this is a comment, it shouldn't appear as an answer to the question. You can learn more in the help center and if you have a minute, you can take the tour. Welcome to Stack Exchange!
â uhoh
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30155%2fwhy-didn-t-the-spacecraft-used-for-the-apollo-11-mission-melt-in-the-earth-s-atm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
19
The important thing to note is that 'melting point' is the temperature that the material itself needs to be in order to melt.
â Jack
yesterday
19
I am probably going to be very sorry for even asking this question, but ⦠Why exactly does the Moon Landing being faked prove the Earth is Flat? Why would the Earth care whether Neil Armstrong stepped on the Moon or a studio in North Hollywood?
â Jörg W Mittag
yesterday
4
@JörgWMittag - It's not that the Moon landing being faked proves the Earth is flat, but rather that a flat Earth means that the Moon landings had to have been faked. Flat Earth is possibly the most dangerous religion there is.
â David Hammen
yesterday
4
You might also want to look at our canonical response to Moon landing deniers which also talks about flat earth a little: space.stackexchange.com/questions/28172/â¦
â Organic Marble
yesterday
5
@Carl - You're using logic. I'm not sure that's a productive tactic with the Flat-Earthers. :(
â Don Branson
yesterday